Skip to main content

State v. Wilkins

Citations

  • 7 P.3d 252
  • 269 Kan. 256
  • 2000 Kan. LEXIS 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that defendant's timely notice of appeal containing technical errors that did not prejudice State did not deprive court of appellate jurisdiction
  • focusing on the State's failure to show prejudice in finding notice of appeal sufficient to confer jurisdiction
  • focusing on State's failure to show prejudice in finding notice of appeal sufficient to confer jurisdiction
  • relying on State v. Griffen, 241 Kan. 68, 69-70, 734 P.2d 1089 (1987
  • intent does not need to be directly proved by the state but can be shown by circumstantial evidence
  • court accepts defense counsel's representation that \judgment of sentence\ in notice of appeal was typographical error and \judgment and sentence\ was actually intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.