Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/2/2000
State v. Wilkins
Citations
- 7 P.3d 252
- 269 Kan. 256
- 2000 Kan. LEXIS 501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that defendant's timely notice of appeal containing technical errors that did not prejudice State did not deprive court of appellate jurisdiction
- focusing on the State's failure to show prejudice in finding notice of appeal sufficient to confer jurisdiction
- focusing on State's failure to show prejudice in finding notice of appeal sufficient to confer jurisdiction
- relying on State v. Griffen, 241 Kan. 68, 69-70, 734 P.2d 1089 (1987
- intent does not need to be directly proved by the state but can be shown by circumstantial evidence
- court accepts defense counsel's representation that \judgment of sentence\ in notice of appeal was typographical error and \judgment and sentence\ was actually intended
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-10-23· cited 195×
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-12-23· cited 164×
- State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-03· cited 141×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 131×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-03-25· cited 119×
- State v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-02-14· cited 75×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 63×
- State v. BerrethSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-04-06· cited 62×
- State v. GholstonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-07· cited 48×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 42×
- State v. LaurelSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-30· cited 42×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 31×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-20· cited 28×
- State v. ArculeoCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-30· cited 19×
- Tullis v. Pittsburg State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-08-25· cited 10×
- Hernandez v. PistotnikCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2021-07-23· cited 8×
- State v. DozalCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-03-21· cited 7×
- Vallejo v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-09-16· cited 6×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-09-19· cited 5×
- Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-01-11· cited 5×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lisenko v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-10-15· cited 70×
- In Re BerkowitzCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-10-26· cited 46×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 45×
- State v. SeelkeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-03-05· cited 42×
- Crawford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1968-11-20· cited 41×
- State v. GriffenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-03-27· cited 40×
- State v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1950-08-23· cited 39×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 37×
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-03-08· cited 37×
- Farno v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1974-03-28· cited 34×
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-07-13· cited 31×
- Kondrup v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1968-04-22· cited 31×
- State v. EdgingtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-01-21· cited 14×
- State v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 9×
- State v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-01-22· cited 9×
- State v. RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1898-12-06· cited 6×
- State v. Van GilderSupreme Court of Kansas· 1934-07-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.