Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/13/1984

State v. Harper

Citations

685 P.2d 850
235 Kan. 825
1984 Kan. LEXIS 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

intent underlying entry into a building \is rarely susceptible of direct proof; it is usually inferred from the surrounding facts and circumstances\
intent underlying entiy into a building “is rarely susceptible of direct proof; it is usually inferred from the surrounding facts and circumstances”
burglary, [K.S.A. 2143715(a)], defined as entering a building “with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein,” is a specific intent crime
jury could reasonably infer from defendants planning and execution of robbery a specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm
jury could reasonably infer from defendant's planning and execution of robbery a specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm
burglary, K.S.A. 21-3715[a], defined as entering a building “with intent to commit a felony, theft or sexual battery therein,” is a specific intent crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.