State v. Holloway

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4636

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying Appellant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, as Appellant was timely brought to trial. The court also did not err in denying Appellant's motion to suppress evidence, because the police received consent from an occupant to search the area in which Appellant had been seen with suspected drugs. In addition, Appellant's conviction for several trafficking and drug possession offenses was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Furthermore, trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to call a witness for the suppression hearing. Finally, the trial court made all requisite statutory findings to support consecutive sentences we also cannot clearly and convincingly find that the record does not support the trial court's findings or that the sentence was contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.