State v. Whitley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• property must be a \thing of value\ for burning it to be arson
• property must be a “thing of value” for burning it to be arson
• in which the court opined that it did not believe that “‘symbolic value’ or ‘value in use’” was intended by the legislature to serve as sufficient evidence of value
• rag lit by match or other incendiary device not property under arson statutory scheme
• “symbolic value” or “value in use” does not satisfy statutory definition of property
• in which the court opined that it did not believe that “ ‘symbolic value’ or ‘value in use’ ” was 358 State v. Waterhouse intended by the legislature to serve as sufficient evidence of value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wagner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-02-26· cited 124×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Deford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
• State v. Waterhouse
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 14×
• State v. Leckenby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 11×
• State v. Kaiser
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 9×
• State v. Nyhuis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-22· cited 3×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 3×
• Hurst v. Employment Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-09-10· cited 1×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-03· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• State v. Krummacher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
• State v. Harris
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 82×