Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/17/2013
State v. Montgomery
Citations
- 256 Or. App. 222
- 300 P.3d 221
- 2013 WL 1682614
- 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that [the] defendant [had] advanced below”
- concluding that the defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that defen- dant advanced below”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 1998-10-07· cited 123×
- State v. WhitleyOregon Supreme Court· 1983-08-02· cited 11×
- Wilson v. WALLUSKI WESTERN LTD.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-25· cited 4×
- State v. StothoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.