Skip to main content

State v. Montgomery

Citations

  • 256 Or. App. 222
  • 300 P.3d 221
  • 2013 WL 1682614
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that [the] defendant [had] advanced below”
  • concluding that the defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that defen- dant advanced below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.