State v. Kaiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that substitution of a personal representative would be permissible in a post-conviction or habeas corpus appeal
• assuming without deciding that substitution of a personal representative would be permissible in a post-conviction or habeas corpus appeal
• appellate rules allow substitution of party in civil case, but require dismissal of appeal from conviction of crime upon death of defendant
• dismiss- ing petition for review filed by lawyer in the Supreme Court after the lawyer’s client had died because no party had stand- ing to file it
• dismiss- ing petition for review filed by lawyer in the Supreme Court after the lawyer’s client had died because no party had stand- ing to file it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Makaila
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 38×
• Sutton v. Hirvonen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Hernandez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-03-13· cited 21×
• State v. Hoxsie
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 17×
• People v. Robinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-07· cited 12×
• Stafney v. Reyes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-03· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Whitley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-08-02· cited 11×
• Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. Cadwell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-10-23· cited 10×
• Hamilton v. Hughey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-12-29· cited 9×
• State v. Kaiser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-29· cited 1×