State v. Nyhuis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for purposes of the reckless burning statute, ORS 164.335, the presumption of property value in “an amount” less than $50 in ORS 164.115 still requires proof of some market value
• rejecting the state’s reliance on the statutory presumption in ORS 164.115 to establish that the items at issue there were “property” with “value” as those terms are used in ORS 164.005(5) and ORS 164.115(1), because the state did not present “sufficient (or any
• for purposes of arson statutes, \property of another\ refers to property that has monetary value
• generally rejecting argument that “nothing” is not “an amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 5×
• Jones v. Nava
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-09· cited 3×
• State v. Waterhouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Deford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
• Berkheimers, Inc. v. Citizens Valley Bank
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-12-19· cited 18×
• State v. Whitley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-08-02· cited 11×
• State v. Starr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-01-03· cited 3×