Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/14/1993
State v. Whitehead
Citations
- 855 P.2d 1149
- 121 Or. App. 619
- 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the inquiry is whether the content of a statement is incriminating
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-22· cited 24×
- Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 9×
- State v. DillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-16· cited 5×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-12· cited 3×
- State v. WahsiseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-27
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 118×
- State v. MedenbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-08· cited 23×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 17×
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-09· cited 15×
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-25· cited 13×
- State v. KnochCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-24· cited 8×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-08· cited 7×
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.