State v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant could have reasonably inferred under the circumstances that he was under arrest for DUII even though the arresting officer never explicitly told him that he was
• request to perform field sobriety tests does not create inherently compelling circumstances for Miranda purposes, as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
• State v. Nielsen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-26· cited 26×
• State v. Whitehead
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-14· cited 10×
• State v. Schaffer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-22· cited 9×
• Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 9×
• State v. Harrison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 6×
• State v. Fish
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-21· cited 5×
• State v. Dill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-16· cited 5×
• State v. Mourlas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-12· cited 2×
• State v. Burreson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-29
• State v. Wahsise
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Spencer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 145×
• State v. Groda
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 65×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-06· cited 37×
• State v. Wells
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-25· cited 13×
• State v. Van Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-06-19· cited 11×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-08· cited 7×