Hamrick v. State
Citations
- 828 S.E.2d 596
- 426 S.C. 638
Syllabus
Daniel Hamrick appeals his conviction for felony driving under the influence resulting in great bodily injury. We find the trial court erred in admitting the opinion testimony of an officer on the subject of accident reconstruction. The officer's testimony was not admissible as lay opinion under Rule 701, SCRE, and the court failed to make the necessary findings the officer was qualified to give such an opinion under Rule 702, SCRE. We reverse and remand to the court of general sessions for a new trial.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the officer arrived on the scene forty-eight minutes after the accident, he \did not perceive the location of the impact\
- recognizing that accident reconstruction testimony requires an expert witness foundation because \[a]ccident reconstruction is a highly technical and specialized field\ that relies upon principles unfamiliar to the general public
- noting that Rule 701 provides that lay opinions are \limited to those opinions . . . rationally based on the perception of the witness\
- holding the trial court erred because it \failed to make the necessary findings that the State established the foundation required by Rule 702\
- finding evidence of the defendant's out-of-court experiment was probative of whether the State's evidence was accurate and credible
- providing evidence of an out-of-court experiment is admissible if it is relevant under Rule 401, SCRE, and not otherwise inadmissible under Rules 402 & 403, SCRE
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Few
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Jonathan S. OstrowskiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-11-03
- State v. Jerome Jenkins Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-04-06
- State v. Jaron GibbsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-01-04
- State v. GermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-05
- State v. GermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-21
- State v. Tyrone WallaceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-08-30
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-04-23· cited 231×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-28· cited 141×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-27· cited 85×
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-07-30· cited 48×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-09-10· cited 34×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 32×
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-17· cited 18×
- State v. CountsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-07-08· cited 14×
- Jackson Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. Price Ex Rel. Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-04-07· cited 13×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-26· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.