Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/11/2019
State v. Whitaker
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2823
Syllabus
Sentencing R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. The trial court's apparent misunderstanding of the record rebuts the presumption that the court properly considered the statutory sentencing factors. Because we find by clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the sentence, appellant's sentence is reversed and the case remanded for resentencing.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-25· cited 115×
- State v. Rahab (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-04-18· cited 111×
- State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 57×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-09· cited 53×
- State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-16· cited 38×
- State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 32×
- State v. McGowanOhio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 31×
- State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-27· cited 25×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-10· cited 11×
- State v. BinfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-11· cited 9×
- State v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.