Skip to main content

State v. Morgan

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1834

Syllabus

Restitution, stipulation, ability to pay, consideration, sentence, contrary to law, supported by the record. The record demonstrates that the trial court considered appellant's present and future ability to pay restitution when sufficient information was contained in the presentence investigation report. Additionally, the appellant stipulated to the restitution amount and order. Appellant's maximum sentence is not contrary to law and is supported by the record.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.