State v. Pettigrew
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3877
Syllabus
Felony sentencing R.C. 2929.11 contrary to law clear and convincing evidence R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). Judgment affirmed. Appellant did not meet his burden in clearly and convincingly demonstrating that the trial court's sentence was contrary to law. The trial court indicated that it considered the purposes of felony sentencing pursuant to R.C. 2929.11 and the sentence was not outside of the statutory range for the offenses that appellant pled guilty to.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-03-15· cited 57×
- State v. WhitakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.