Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/17/2004

State v. Whelan

Citations

91 P.3d 1011
208 Ariz. 168
428 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining issue preclusion is used sparingly in criminal cases and requires a valid and final judgment on the merits
“ ‘Law of the case concerns the practice of refusing to reopen questions previously decided in the same case by the same court or a higher appellate court.’ ”
appellate court decision issued after dismissal without prejudice in criminal case constituted intervening change in law that prevented state from being collaterally estopped from refiling charges
“‘Law of the case concerns the practice of refusing to reopen questions previously decided in the same case by the same court or a higher appellate court.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Garbarino, Timmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.