Skip to main content
· 11/29/2006

Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc.

Citations

  • 213 Ariz. 618
  • 146 P.3d 1027
  • 492 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
  • 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that in interpreting a statute, “we give meaning to each word or phrase ... so none is rendered insignificant, contradictory, superfluous, or void”
  • providing that under res judicata, “a final judgment on the merits bars further claims by [the same] parties or their privies based on the same cause of action”
  • “Examples of persons in privity include employers and employees, principals 21 and agents, and indemnitors and indemnitees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vásquez, Pelander, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.