Skip to main content
· 2/4/2003

Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd.

Citations

  • 62 P.3d 966
  • 204 Ariz. 221
  • 392 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that issue preclusion binds a party to a previously rendered decision
  • “If the first four elements of [issue preclusion] are present, Arizona permits defensive, but not offensive use of the doctrine.”
  • “If the first four elements of collateral estoppel are present, Arizona permits defensive, but not offensive use of the doctrine.”
  • “[A] vacated judgment cannot have any collateral estoppel effect.”
  • vacated judgment lacks preclusive effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Noyes, Garbarino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.