Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 322 N.E.2d 461
  • 59 Ill. 2d 557
  • 1975 Ill. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that collateral estoppel prevented relitigation of a “final” suppression order when the state had a right to appeal but did not
  • state collaterally estopped to relitigate suppression order in subsequent proceeding where state had a right, but chose not to appeal
  • state collaterally estopped to relitigate suppression order in subsequent proceeding where state had a right, but chose not to appeal
  • defendant’s successful motion to suppress given collateral estoppel effect in subsequent prosecution for a separate crime
  • the court’s holding determined the question that was common to the prosecutions under both indictments, and the State was precluded from litigating the question a second time
  • where state did not appeal from suppression order, but dismissed indictment with leave to reinstate, state was barred under doctrine of collateral estoppel from using suppressed evidence in the prosecution under the second indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.