Skip to main content
· 6/11/1991

State v. Poupard

Citations

  • 471 N.W.2d 686
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 604
  • 1991 WL 97100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the dismissal of only one of two charges had a critical impact on the outcome of the trial
  • rejecting expansive interpretation that “would substantially broaden the spectrum of conduct” not requiring a permit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Huspeni, Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.