Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/30/2007
State v. Weaver
Citations
- 649 S.E.2d 479
- 374 S.C. 313
- 2007 S.C. LEXIS 293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the warrantless search of defendant's vehicle under the automobile exception did not violate the state constitutional privacy provision
- holding ultimately the search in question met the automobile exception to the warrant requirement and did not violate the more expansive right to privacy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-09-24· cited 276×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 44×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-02-26· cited 36×
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-01-28· cited 15×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-04-22· cited 15×
- State v. CountsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-07-08· cited 14×
- State v. DykesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-22· cited 14×
- Hamrick v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-05-15· cited 9×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-03-13· cited 8×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-06-13· cited 7×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-04-27· cited 7×
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-05-09· cited 2×
- State v. BonillaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-12-11
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-02-19
- State of South Carolina v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-13
- State of South Carolina v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-09-02
- State v. DykesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-05-09
- State v. TynesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-03
- Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-01-05
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 680×
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- Florida v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 188×
- Florida v. MeyersSupreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 165×
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 111×
- State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 91×
- State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 89×
- United States v. Ronald Lee BrookinsFourth Circuit· 2003-09-25· cited 60×
- State v. MissouriSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-27· cited 47×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-04· cited 39×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 30×
- State v. MollisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-30· cited 27×
- Norman v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2006-05-22· cited 17×
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-02-06· cited 15×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 14×
- Binder v. Bedford Township Police DepartmentSixth Circuit· 2004-02-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.