Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/19/2020
State v. Moore
Syllabus
The Court affirms the court of appeals' decision as modified, finding law enforcement's limited search of a cell phone's SIM card to establish ownership of the phone was reasonable under the circumstances and therefore did not constitute a Fourth Amendment violation.
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 1,201×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 993×
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 895×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.