State v. Wright
Citations
- 235 Conn. App. 143
Syllabus
Convicted, following a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree, sexual assault in the second degree, and risk of injury to a child, the defendant appealed. Following the second day of trial, the defendant did not appear in court, and the court completed the trial and sentenced the defendant in absentia. On appeal, the defendant claimed, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to support certain of his convictions. Held: The jury reasonably could have concluded that the cumulative force of the evidence established the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as there was sufficient evidence that the defendant's abuse of the victim occurred after the victim turned thirteen years old, as required to sustain his convictions of sexual assault in the second degree and risk of injury to a child. The defendant's unpreserved claim that the trial court violated his constitu- tional rights to due process and to counsel by denying his midtrial requests for a continuance failed under the third prong of State v. Golding (213 Conn. 233), as the defendant failed to show that the alleged constitutional violations existed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's requests for a midtrial continuance, as the court considered the status of the case, made reasonable efforts to accommodate the defendant, and marked off two days of trial testimony to allow the defendant to prepare. The trial court did not commit plain error in failing to advise the defendant of the consequences of failing to appear and in trying and sentencing him in absentia, as the defendant's conduct constituted a waiver of his right to be present at both his trial and sentencing, and the defendant failed to make a showing that this case presented circumstances extraordinary enough to merit this court's exercise of its supervisory authority. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defense counsel's motion for a mistrial when the defendant failed to appe
Judges: Elgo; Moll; Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-06-03· cited 102×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-12· cited 92×
- Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-14· cited 90×
- State v. BeckenbachSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-10· cited 77×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 66×
- State v. DrakefordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-20· cited 61×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-16· cited 49×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. ParhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-04-04· cited 39×
- State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 31×
- Housatonic Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-06-28· cited 29×
- State v. YoungsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-05· cited 25×
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-03-27· cited 20×
- State v. WeatherspoonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-07-30· cited 20×
- State v. LesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-01-17· cited 19×
- Chestnut Point Realty, LLC v. Town of E. WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-01-24· cited 17×
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. PritchardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-02-27· cited 13×
- State v. ROSS V.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-08-26· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.