Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/29/1967
State v. Watson
Citations
- 436 P.2d 175
- 7 Ariz. App. 81
- 1967 Ariz. App. LEXIS 644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While complete uniformity in verdicts [for wrongful death] can never be achieved, there must be some limits to the unevenness that will be tolerated.”
- “While complete uniformity in verdicts [for wrongful death] can never be achieved, there must be some limits to the unevenness that will be tolerated.”
- failure to warn of narrow bridge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Molloy, Hathaway, Krucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-07-08· cited 257×
- HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1986-07-28· cited 81×
- Mullins v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1969-04-22· cited 52×
- Reben v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-03-25· cited 50×
- Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-07-03· cited 33×
- Spettigue v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-10-08· cited 33×
- Lemke v. MuellerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-04-08· cited 27×
- Ulan v. RichtarsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-10-15· cited 25×
- Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-09-01· cited 25×
- Arizona State Highway Department v. BechtoldArizona Supreme Court· 1969-10-23· cited 22×
- City of Glendale v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-04-25· cited 18×
- Dunham v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 18×
- Starkins v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-01-23· cited 17×
- Sedillo v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-02-03· cited 15×
- Delarosa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-01-31· cited 14×
- Larson v. Independent School District No. 314Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-19· cited 12×
- Slavin v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-30· cited 11×
- Walker v. County of CoconinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-08-13· cited 11×
- Waqui v. Tanner Bros. Contracting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-01-08· cited 10×
- White v. Greater Arizona Bicycling AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-08· cited 7×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1963-04-25· cited 255×
- Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-04· cited 230×
- MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court· 1958-04-16· cited 91×
- In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court· 1966-06-22· cited 67×
- Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court· 1954-03-22· cited 51×
- Bryan v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1955-07-18· cited 50×
- Boies v. ColeArizona Supreme Court· 1965-11-17· cited 49×
- Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court· 1953-06-22· cited 46×
- City of Phoenix v. CamfieldArizona Supreme Court· 1965-03-11· cited 45×
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ParrArizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-15· cited 43×
- Caldwell v. TremperArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-01· cited 41×
- City of Phoenix v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-09-03· cited 38×
- Hirsh v. ManleyArizona Supreme Court· 1956-07-16· cited 26×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GastelumArizona Supreme Court· 1929-12-16· cited 26×
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. WusichArizona Supreme Court· 1962-10-25· cited 24×
- Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-01-18· cited 17×
- Southern Pacific Company v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-06-17· cited 16×
- Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co.Eighth Circuit· 1949-04-12· cited 16×
- Beltran v. StroudArizona Supreme Court· 1945-07-14· cited 11×
- Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. BerryArizona Supreme Court· 1938-05-02· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.