Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because notice letters preceded first amended complaint “by more than thirty days, Plaintiff was entitled to request damages” in the first amended complaint “regardless of whether she could have done so in the [initial] complaint”
• “If Plaintiff were to prevail under the UCL and CLRA, Defendants’ SPF labeling duties would remain unchanged.”
• plaintiff’s 11 claims seeking to prevent sunscreen manufacturer from combining the use of SPF ratings 12 with price differentials and claims of greater protection were not preempted because 13 defendant’s SPF labeling duties wouldn’t change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).