MacNeil v. Perkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absent prior decision or statute to contrary, Arizona courts will follow Restatement of the Law whenever applicable
• in the absence of contrary controlling law, the Arizona courts will follow the Restatement of Law
• in the absence of contrary controlling law, the Arizona courts will follow the Restatement of Law
• under Arizona law, “[a] trespasser is one who does an unlawful act or a lawful act in an unlawful manner to the injury of the person or property of another” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).