Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 12/24/2009

State v. Watkins

Citations

  • 224 P.3d 485
  • 148 Idaho 418
  • 2009 Ida. LEXIS 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a district court abused its discretion by admitting inadmissible hearsay
  • stating “[i]n the absence of any document, . . . there was simply no ‘business record’ that might fall within this hearsay exception”
  • reviewing an issue not raised in an opening brief where the respondent had the opportunity to respond in supplemental briefing
  • finding written notes relied on by the witness “were not offered into evidence” and “[i]n the absence of any document ... there was simply no ‘business record’ that might fall within this hearsay exception”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.