State v. Jorge A. Lopez-Orozco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “unavailability” finding must be 4 supported by substantial and competent evidence
• “[A]ny statute pertaining to the admission of evidence is of no force or effect where an Idaho Rule of Evidence covers the same subject matter.”
• “[A]ny statute pertaining to the admission of evidence is of no force or effect where an Idaho 14 Rule of Evidence covers the same subject matter.”
• “[A]ny statute pertaining to the admission of evidence is of no force or effect where an Idaho Rule of Evidence covers the same subject matter.”
• “[A]ny statute pertaining to the admission of evidence is of no force or effect where an Idaho Rule of Evidence covers the same subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).