Washington Supreme Court· 8/16/2018

State v. Watkins

Citations

423 P.3d 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that the juvenile court’s automatic decline of jurisdiction does not implicate the Eighth Amendment because adult courts have discretion to depart from the adult standard range under Houston-Sconiers
reaffirming In re Boot , 130 Wash.2d 553 , 925 P.2d 964 (1996)
reaffirming In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553, 925 P.2d 964 (1996)
reaffirming In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553, 925 P.2d 964 (1996)
\Juveniles charged with crimes have a right to procedural due process.\ (citing In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 30-31, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1967))
\Juveniles charged with crimes have a right to procedural due process.\ (citing In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 30-31, 87 S. Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.