Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 1 A.3d 76
  • 298 Conn. 1
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence when defendant’s foundation for proffered evidence was ‘‘wholly specula- tive’’
  • ''[i]f the proffered evidence is not relevant ... the defendant's right to confrontation is not affected'' [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • ‘‘counsel did not lay a proper foundation to demonstrate that the victim’s testimony was, in fact, contradicted by his prior conviction of possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Palmer, Vertefeuiue, Zarella, McLacwan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.