State v. Waterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under Owen and other cases, the trial court plainly erred in not instructing the jury that it had to find that the defendant acted with a culpable men- tal state with respect to the value of property damaged for purposes of first-degree criminal mischief
• holding, “[i]n light of recent cases on the law of culpa- ble mental states,” that it was plain error not to instruct the jury that a culpable mental state was required “with respect to the value of the property damaged on the first-degree criminal mischief charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-26· cited 98×
• State v. Tow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-10· cited 14×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-23· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-03· cited 115×
• State v. Lopez-Minjarez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 48×
• State v. Prophet
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 28×
• State v. Lusk
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 8×
• State v. Wiggins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-12· cited 4×
• State v. Washburn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-07-27· cited 3×
• State v. Washburn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-28· cited 2×
• State v. Pendergraft
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 1×