State v. Lusk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that preservation policies are not undermined in exercising discretion to reverse a conviction supported by insufficient proof where the record was fully developed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rivera-Waddle
  Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 13×
• State v. Strouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 9×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-05· cited 5×
• State v. Waterman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-25· cited 5×
• State v. Hodges
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 3×
• State v. Wenzell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-03
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30
• State v. Vaninetti
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-31

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Fults
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
• State v. Parkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Link
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-05-07· cited 22×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 13×
• State v. Burnett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-26· cited 11×
• State v. Kuznetsov
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-18· cited 10×
• State v. Allen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-24· cited 8×
• State v. Hockersmith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 7×
• State v. Moresco
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 2×
• State v. Cardosa-Marlowe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-06· cited 1×