State v. Washburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence was insufficient to support the defendant’s conviction for first- degree criminal mischief for stripping bark from 28 chittam- wood trees, where state failed to present evidence allowing for the meaningful valuation of the damages caused by that conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Waterman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-25· cited 5×
• State v. Cannon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-09· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Washburn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-07-27· cited 3×