Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/25/1983
State v. Nordstrom
Citations
- 331 N.W.2d 901
- 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding right to appointed counsel exists for all indigent misdemeanor defendants who may be imprisoned, not only those who actually are imprisoned
- holding right to appointed counsel exists for all indigent misdemeanor defendants who may be imprisoned, not only those who actually are imprisoned
- holding right to appointed counsel exists for all indigent misdemeanor defendants who may be imprisoned, not only those who actually are imprisoned
- filing a petition to enter a plea of guilty for the record “not a burdensome requirement”
- challenge to enhancement use of misdemeanor DWI
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. OrrNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-10-01· cited 95×
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-06-08· cited 75×
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-18· cited 60×
- State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-09-21· cited 49×
- State of Iowa v. Archaletta Latrice YoungSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-04-03· cited 49×
- People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-08-29· cited 43×
- State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-06-24· cited 38×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-02-26· cited 33×
- Spann v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 26×
- Bilbrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-08-23· cited 23×
- State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-21· cited 22×
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-01-21· cited 22×
- State v. EdmisonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-12-27· cited 21×
- State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-22· cited 20×
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-04-13· cited 19×
- State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-04-30· cited 17×
- State v. MotlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-19· cited 17×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-02-15· cited 15×
- State v. MunnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-03-07· cited 13×
- State v. AndrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-27· cited 13×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 746×
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 553×
- Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-10-25· cited 174×
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-17· cited 145×
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-10· cited 119×
- State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 77×
- State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-12-01· cited 64×
- Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-02-23· cited 63×
- United States v. Eugene LufmanSeventh Circuit· 1972-02-23· cited 48×
- Price v. AmdalSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-10· cited 33×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Raymond G. Lasky v. Hon. J. Edwin Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1973-01-19· cited 26×
- State v. PropotnikSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-22· cited 25×
- State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-04-05· cited 20×
- People v. McCartyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-11-05· cited 16×
- State v. CasarezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-01-05· cited 10×
- State v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-06-08· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.