Vernlund v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where defendant successfully challenged enhanced DUI conviction based on his claim that no factual basis was established for predicate DUI conviction, that conviction \must be vacated\ and \cannot be used for enhancement\
• holding that where defendant successfully challenged enhanced DUI conviction based on his claim that no factual basis was established for predicate DUI conviction, that conviction “must be vacated” and “cannot be used for enhancement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).