Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/21/2020
State v. Wallace
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4168
Syllabus
While odor of raw marijuana, alone, may support issuance of warrant, lacking an evidentiary nexus between the odor and the place to be searched, motion to suppress for lack of sufficient probable cause should have been granted. Judgment reversed.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 266×
- United States v. James E. SchultzSixth Circuit· 1994-01-20· cited 188×
- McKenney v. HarrisonEighth Circuit· 2011-03-28· cited 105×
- United States v. Khayree HarrisonThird Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 58×
- United States v. HolmesD.C. Circuit· 2007-10-23· cited 40×
- State v. Dibble (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-02-20· cited 30×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 18×
- State v. McClainOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-11· cited 7×
- State v. WildmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-31· cited 5×
- State v. PittsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-24· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.