Skip to main content

State v. Pitts

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 2655

Syllabus

Appellant's general assertions that the affiant in a search warrant application was lying does not constitute a substantial preliminary showing of a false statement so as to require a Franks hearing. Appellant is not entitled to disclosure of confidential informants where their testimony is not vital to establishing any of the elements of the crimes and appellant's defense is not prejudiced. Appellant is not entitled to the return of seized property that is subject to civil forfeiture proceedings.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.