Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/17/2011
State v. Wiseman
Citations
- 261 P.3d 76
- 245 Or. App. 136
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a named informant’s report of “suspicious” activity was properly “considered as a part of the totality of the circumstances in determining whether there was reasonable suspicion”
- homeowner’s report of specific suspicious circumstances outside her home “was reliable and could be considered together with the other circumstances” in determining whether a responding officer had reasonable suspicion that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity
- officer had reasonable suspicion of theft to stop a truck when a neighbor observed the occupants of the truck loading a bike into the truck’s bed at 1:50 a.m. in a high-crime area and the occupants made furtive movements when the patrol car passed them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 17×
- State v. T. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-06· cited 10×
- State v. ClinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-29· cited 9×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 8×
- State v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 3×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-19· cited 3×
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 2×
- State v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
- United States v. Maurillo Rojas-MillanNinth Circuit· 2000-12-08· cited 135×
- State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 58×
- State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 56×
- State v. Villegas-VarelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-21· cited 37×
- State v. MitcheleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 33×
- State v. ButkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-07· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Cosme V.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-05-26· cited 15×
- State v. KolendarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 15×
- State v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-12· cited 11×
- State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-25· cited 7×
- State v. GossOregon Supreme Court· 2008-07-02· cited 7×
- State v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.