Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 181 N.E.3d 634
  • 2021 Ohio 4321

Syllabus

On remand from the Supreme Court of Ohio, to the extent we can consider his argument, sufficient evidence supported Walker's conviction of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, the prosecutor's statements did not deprive Walker of a fair trial, Walker did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel, and the trial court did not err in declining to merge Walker's conviction of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity with the underlying predicate offenses.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.