Skip to main content

State v. Walker

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4346

Syllabus

Because the seizure of a digital video recorder (\DVR\) did not exceed the scope of the authorizing search warrant, defendant's trial counsel had no grounds on which to move to suppress the video evidence contained on the DVR. Defendant, therefore, did not raise any issue in his postconviction petition as to whether his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress the video evidence. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's postconviction petition without a hearing.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.