Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/2/1999
State v. Vigil
Citations
- 986 P.2d 222
- 195 Ariz. 189
- 288 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 45
- 1999 Ariz. App. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence is unduly prejudicial if it tends to suggest “decision on an improper basis, such as emotion, sympathy or horror”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gerber, Fidel, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 160×
- State v. SchurzArizona Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 139×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. TerrazasArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-14· cited 96×
- State v. IvesArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 63×
- Ernst Brothers Corp. v. Department.of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 43×
- State v. GrannisArizona Supreme Court· 1995-07-25· cited 42×
- State v. CharoArizona Supreme Court· 1988-04-21· cited 33×
- State v. Ramirez EnriquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-04-23· cited 21×
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-10-19· cited 19×
- State v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-02-12· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.