State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether Hargrave governs all duplicitous-indictment issues is “questionable” but nonetheless reviewing the issue for fundamental error
• affirming strike of drug counselor based on potential sympathy for defendant even though prosecutor struck the only two Black jurors
• requiring parties to make a “contemporaneous objection” to preserve an objection on the admissibility of evidence
• similarly distinguishing Lucas where the only justifications for the peremptory strikes were race-neutral

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).