Utah Supreme Court· 10/25/1983

State v. Velasquez

Citations

672 P.2d 1254
1983 Utah LEXIS 1194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a later \motion to strike was not an adequate substitute for an objection\ in the case at hand \because of the close intermingling of the admissible with the inadmissible evidence\ at issue
stating that, under predecessor rule, it was error to admit prior statements made by witness that witness was not asked about at trial
“Caution would certainly suggest that a warrant be obtained if the rights of non-parolees might be affected [by a parole search].”
\Caution would certainly suggest that a warrant be obtained if the rights of non-parolees might be affected [by a parole search].\
\Caution would certainly suggest that a warrant be obtained if the rights of non-parolees might be affected [by a parole search].\
\[PJlolice officers may [not] engage in warrantless searches and seizures as to parolees on the same basis as parole officers.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Call, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.