State v. Velasquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating same in similar circumstances where order lacking required written findings was issued after hearing
• reversing and remanding permanency judgment because of the absence of findings required by statute
• illustrating we have long held that the court is required to make written findings to “ensure that the decision is one that is most likely to lead to a pos- itive outcome for the child”
• illustrating we have long held that the court is required to make written findings to “ensure that the decision is one that is most likely to lead to a pos- itive outcome for the child”
• where permanency judgments fail to comply with statutory requirements, they must be reversed and remanded
• juvenile court’s failure to make the determinations required by ORS 419B.476(5)(a) and (f) is reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).