State v. Valencia Olaya

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when scope of consent is at issue, it is the State’s burden to “establish by clear and convincing evidence that under the totality of the circumstances,” defendant’s rights were not violated
• suggesting that knowledge of the right to refuse consent is not required in order to have effective consent to search an automobile
• suggesting that knowledge of the right to refuse consent is not required in order to have effective consent to search an automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).