Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/30/2020
State v. Ulmer
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4689
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — FOURTH AMENDMENT — SEARCH AND SEIZURE — AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION: The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress a firearm because the odor of burning marijuana did not establish probable cause to support the search of the trunk of the vehicle.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-26· cited 6×
- State v. GraysonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-29· cited 3×
- State v. SkanesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-25· cited 3×
- State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-08· cited 2×
- State v. AcklinOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-08· cited 2×
- State v. HyattOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-26
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-02
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 117×
- State ex rel. Kline v. CarrollOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-02· cited 92×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. ShowesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-26· cited 7×
- State v. WhatleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-09· cited 3×
- State v. QuakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.