Skip to main content

State v. Grayson

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4275

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SEARCH AND SEIZURE – SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST – EXCLUSIONARY RULE – GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION – PROCEDURE/RULES – R.C. 2947.14(A): The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized from his wallet where the officer witnessed a traffic violation, stopped a vehicle, requested identification from the driver and passenger, discovered a warrant for the arrest of defendant, and subsequently conducted a search incident to arrest. Where the state argued the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied because the arresting officer acted in good faith, the defendant failed to demonstrate that a legally-deficient warrant required suppression of the seized evidence.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.