Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/8/2023
State v. Lane
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4044
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SEARCH AND SEIZURE – AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION – PLAIN VIEW EXCEPTION – PROBABLE CAUSE: The trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to suppress where the officer discovered a large bag of marijuana in plain view in defendant's vehicle and thus had probable cause to search the vehicle.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 137×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2003-08-06· cited 128×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-23· cited 53×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 28×
- State v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-04· cited 12×
- State v. HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-11· cited 10×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-15· cited 9×
- State v. UlmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 8×
- State v. PateOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-14· cited 5×
- State v. FlaggOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-02· cited 3×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.