South Dakota Supreme Court· 8/22/1990
State v. Tuttle
Citations
- 460 N.W.2d 157
- 1990 S.D. LEXIS 133
- 1990 WL 120876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is appropriate that the trial court enter written findings of fact in support of any order of restitution”
- defendant is entitled to confront witnesses against him during a restitution hearing, but the rules of evidence and civil burden of proof do not apply
- considering application of procedural due process to orders of restitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sabers, Wuest, Morgan, Miller, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Shilvock-HavirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-06-26· cited 48×
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2010-09-17· cited 44×
- State v. BrownbackMontana Supreme Court· 2010-05-04· cited 19×
- State v. ThayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. GarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 17×
- Burgard v. Benedictine Living CommunitiesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 11×
- In Re the Revocation of the Suspended Sentence of BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 10×
- Hafner v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-27· cited 9×
- State v. RuttmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-18· cited 7×
- State v. FalkenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-11-21· cited 6×
- Acevedo v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-17· cited 6×
- Hughes v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 6×
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-07-24· cited 6×
- State v. HolsingSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 5×
- State v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 5×
- State v. WillsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-08-03· cited 3×
- State v. WinglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 3×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-12· cited 2×
- Hughes v. State Board of Pardons and ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 64×
- State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-06· cited 53×
- State ex rel. D. G. W.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-06-25· cited 44×
- State v. WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 41×
- Shenah v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-19· cited 29×
- United States v. WeldenN.D. Alabama· 1983-07-29· cited 26×
- State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-05-20· cited 23×
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1982-05-25· cited 22×
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 16×
- State v. HerrleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. EllefsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-05-25· cited 8×
- State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-08-01· cited 7×
- In Re United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1984-10-03· cited 4×
- State v. DammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.