State v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court must be reasonably satisfied that the conduct of the probationer did not satisfy the conditions of suspension
• trial court must be reasonably satisfied that the conduct of the probationer did not satisfy the conditions of suspension
• “This Court . . . has recognized that revocation proceedings are not criminal prosecutions. Instead, they are civil proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Rodriguez
  California Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 244×
• State v. Tuttle
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-08-22· cited 31×
• State v. McCormick
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-04-09· cited 14×
• State v. Herrlein
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-01· cited 13×
• State v. Martin
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 11×
• In Re the Revocation of the Suspended Sentence of Brown
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 10×
• Application of Grosh
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 9×
• State v. Bell
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-12· cited 8×
• State v. Short Horn
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-07-27· cited 7×
• Hughes v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & Paroles
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Reif
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-09-02· cited 5×
• Hughes v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 1×
• State v. Dietz
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-11-26· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Elder
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1959-03-23· cited 35×
• State v. Burkman
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-07-11· cited 22×