Skip to main content

State v. Shilvock-Havird

Citations

  • 472 N.W.2d 773
  • 1991 S.D. LEXIS 98
  • 1991 WL 113281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that upon 23A-44-5.1(3)’s effective date, if a “defendant is to be tried again following a mistrial, ... such period [(180 days)] shall commence to run from the date of the mistrial[.]”
  • stating that upon 23A-44-5.1(3)’s effective date, if a “defendant is to be tried again following a mistrial, . . . such period [180 days] shall commence to run from the date of the mistrial[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amundson, Erickson, Henderson, Miller, Sabers, Wuest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.