Skip to main content

State v. Pope

Citations

  • 321 N.W.2d 359
  • 107 Wis. 2d 726
  • 1982 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a restitution order where the evidence in support of the order was the robbery victim’s testimony “about the value of his wrecked car, the cost of certain repairs, the value of some jewelry, and the amount of medical bills”
  • order granting restitution reversed because there was “no evidence ... demonstrating that the trial court considered” the defendant’s financial resources or future ability to pay
  • order granting restitution reversed because there was \no evidence ... demonstrating that the trial court considered\ the defendant's financial resources or future ability to pay
  • court reviewed whether the circuit court satisfied its Wis. Stat. § 973.09(1m) (1979-80) obligation to consider the financial resources and future ability of the probationer to pay when establishing the amount of restitution and method of payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Dean, Cane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.